tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4445269723137820164.post7597999046351752991..comments2008-01-14T13:23:15.162-08:00Sunnyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09474945654006665725noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4445269723137820164.post-83715168650607748882008-01-14T13:23:00.001-08:002008-01-14T13:23:00.001-08:00Sunny, I would like to be the devil's advocate here ... (or the devil himself :))<BR/><BR/>Two things which will make this supremely difficult<BR/><BR/>1. Most good enterprise products have heavy configuration/customization utilities (including form buildier and such). How woudl such a rehaul work with this? Which isthe most complex Web 2.0 application we can use as a bench mark?<BR/><BR/>2. How would this experience be backward compatible with existing user experience? <BR/><BR/>Is tehre any way you can take a sample (though real) application and demonstrate a before/after?Sunil Shindehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12223421848697871761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4445269723137820164.post-27410533566109502882008-01-14T13:23:00.000-08:002008-01-14T13:23:00.000-08:00Sunny, I would like to be the devil's advocate here ... (or the devil himself :))<BR/><BR/>Two things which will make this supremely difficult<BR/><BR/>1. Most good enterprise products have heavy configuration/customization utilities (including form buildier and such). How woudl such a rehaul work with this? Which i sthe most complex Web 2.0 application we can use as a bench mark?<BR/><BR/>2. How would this experience be backward compatible with existing user experience? <BR/><BR/>Is tehre any way you can take a sample (though real) application and demonstrate a before/after?Sunil Shindehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12223421848697871761noreply@blogger.com